Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uuvg5b$33i6g$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Christians getting it wrong Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:10:03 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: <uuvg5b$33i6g$2@dont-email.me> References: <uubp1e$1q8rg$5@dont-email.me> <coqdnVLoi9lduI77nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com> <uuvaic$32gob$1@dont-email.me> <0R2dnX_qQJBlqo77nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 01:10:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="408f3ed53309c0722adecda71294feae"; logging-data="3262672"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Q6vBJccoy3TfkgFl1/U4BIJAp3RvPUds=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:GlyixJavgoqYuVjTREmUTAQyusc= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 2729 BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >On Apr 7, 2024 at 4:34:36 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >>>Apr 7, 2024 at 11:53:47 AM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>>>The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote: >>>>>>>Sat, 6 Apr 2024 16:17:16 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>: >>>>>>>>You're missing my point. The people who want to impose religion upon >>>>>>>>civil life want to do so through legislation and the courts, and they >>>>>>>>have failed at times, succeeded at other times. >>>>>>>As well they should have. >>>>>>Laws restricting or making abortion illegal are an example of success in >>>>>>imposing religion in civil life. >>>>>Only if you believe it's impossible to believe abortion is murder unless >>>>>you also believe in religion/god/supernatural etc. >>>>Unless some state finally got a law passed defining human life beginning >>>>at conception, then no homicide has taken place. If it's not homicide, >>>>then it's not murder. >>>The point is, it doesn't take a belief in a supernatural sky-tyrant for a >>>state to make the determination that life begins at conception. >>HUMAN life >Doesn't change anything. No belief in supernatural ghosts is required for a >legislature to make that determination. That's your hypothetical! That's not literally what's happening in real world actual state legislatures! >>Since common law, an unborn child cannot inherit, and only a child born >>alive inherits. No one recognized that human life began at conception. >>It was never the law. >That doesn't mean the law can't change absent a belief in Quetzalcoatl.