Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uuvg5b$33i6g$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Christians getting it wrong
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:10:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <uuvg5b$33i6g$2@dont-email.me>
References: <uubp1e$1q8rg$5@dont-email.me> <coqdnVLoi9lduI77nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com> <uuvaic$32gob$1@dont-email.me> <0R2dnX_qQJBlqo77nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 01:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="408f3ed53309c0722adecda71294feae";
	logging-data="3262672"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Q6vBJccoy3TfkgFl1/U4BIJAp3RvPUds="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GlyixJavgoqYuVjTREmUTAQyusc=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2729

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>On Apr 7, 2024 at 4:34:36 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>Apr 7, 2024 at 11:53:47 AM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>Sat, 6 Apr 2024 16:17:16 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:

>>>>>>>>You're missing my point. The people who want to impose religion upon
>>>>>>>>civil life want to do so through legislation and the courts, and they
>>>>>>>>have failed at times, succeeded at other times.

>>>>>>>As well they should have.

>>>>>>Laws restricting or making abortion illegal are an example of success in
>>>>>>imposing religion in civil life.

>>>>>Only if you believe it's impossible to believe abortion is murder unless
>>>>>you also believe in religion/god/supernatural etc.

>>>>Unless some state finally got a law passed defining human life beginning
>>>>at conception, then no homicide has taken place. If it's not homicide,
>>>>then it's not murder.

>>>The point is, it doesn't take a belief in a supernatural sky-tyrant for a
>>>state to make the determination that life begins at conception.
 
>>HUMAN life

>Doesn't change anything. No belief in supernatural ghosts is required for a
>legislature to make that determination.

That's your hypothetical! That's not literally what's happening in real
world actual state legislatures!

>>Since common law, an unborn child cannot inherit, and only a child born
>>alive inherits. No one recognized that human life began at conception.
>>It was never the law.

>That doesn't mean the law can't change absent a belief in Quetzalcoatl.