Article <uv462j$dsd3$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <uv462j$dsd3$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<uv462j$dsd3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Phrases that should be banned on Usenet (Was: Command Languages
 Versus Programming Languages)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 21:48:35 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <uv462j$dsd3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <uv0ob4$3gcfl$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv0v7l$3i0l6$1@dont-email.me> <20240408122937.339@kylheku.com>
 <uv1heb$3hol5$1@news.xmission.com> <uv2qev$37fk$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv3mtq$a25k$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 19:48:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e5402271be07e4c30967281c98e603b9";
	logging-data="455075"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+uU790J8Y0NiBeE0n+cm3M"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gFaI4FBaS05Vl5DKv5+uF/AGwj4=
In-Reply-To: <uv3mtq$a25k$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1842

On 09.04.2024 17:30, candycanearter07 wrote:
> Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote at 07:24 this Tuesday (GMT):
>>
>> Id est, exempli gratia, focussing on the argument per se, as
>> Kaz sensibly suggested. :-)
>>
>> (It's good that in English most of the Latin is hidden behind
>> abbreviations like i.e. and e.g.; but there's no abbreviation
>> for "per se"? Probably because p.s. is already occupied?)
> 
> I think it might be because per se is so short.

Not shorter than "id est". ;-)

Janis