Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: how
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:02:14 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <uv4hdm$gafg$5@dont-email.me>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <uurkev$8bgp$3@i2pn2.org>
 <LxB_YnfSbeGdsX3uI9_jP_AGyIk@jntp> <uus9rf$8bgo$2@i2pn2.org>
 <jiByUg3itYlr4c-5gc54C5DtzYc@jntp> <uutvak$8bgp$6@i2pn2.org>
 <U7GL1fl3wTDGDgsPhy8ZdN3VReM@jntp> <uuump7$ck7p$1@i2pn2.org>
 <NCVbior4erTrQ2rfbzJ2QgfS_bM@jntp> <uv1u89$gg07$1@i2pn2.org>
 <ekdJ-XDKSkYPaHoPLf34i3GSGUs@jntp> <uv4hao$gafg$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 23:02:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1e0154287d270c974cd6798ddf950547";
	logging-data="535024"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IzmZpG1Fzy8JvpB519adhSDvoqfSeffE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DzqbmGmQZ/pmknl0Ks2KxH8jkFw=
In-Reply-To: <uv4hao$gafg$4@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2693

On 4/9/2024 4:00 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 4/9/2024 5:16 AM, WM wrote:
>> Le 09/04/2024 à 01:22, Richard Damon a écrit :
>>> On 4/8/24 9:44 AM, WM wrote:
>>>> Le 07/04/2024 à 19:56, Richard Damon a écrit :
>>>>> On 4/7/24 9:23 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> So, With infinite sets, a proper subset CAN be the same size as 
>>>>>>> its parent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Impossible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, PROVEN.
>>>>
>>>> Proven impossble with my matrix,
>>>
>>> Nope, since you matrix doesn't follow the required form.
>>
>> It does precilsely.
>>
>>>>> and we can build such a mapping between the set of natural Numbers 
>>>>> (N) with the set of even Numbers (E).
>>>>
>>>> Only handwaving by "and so on"
>>
>>>> In all cases there are infinitely many exceptions.
>>>> ∀n ∈ ℕ_applied: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.
>>>
>>> I didn't say "N_applied", I said N.
>>
>> But what you can use belongs to ℕ_applied. Otherwise show a natural 
>> number that completes the bijection, i.e., which has not infinitely 
>> many pairings on front.
> 
> Are you some sort hardcore abortion survivor? What happened to you?
> 

Did you manage to survive the process? Well, if so, there has been a lot 
of damage. Damn it WM, there is no largest natural number... Sorry for 
being an asshole here, but god damn.