Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <moebius@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 05:37:18 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <uv51hf$nnc2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp>
 <56fdf4ac-fed6-4c64-96e1-0c11e62df55f@att.net>
 <6VFp9Pr9I394XSyRAi0w-GMz2GY@jntp>
 <373b543f-be44-4441-b9d3-9fdb44287e95@att.net>
 <ymJoogUCploI4Stcei3A4L4PLPg@jntp>
 <fa45fae3-33bd-495d-8415-07804b36f6f8@att.net>
 <780i3eKdKZ5P_9FaZ1WI-mHhUTs@jntp>
 <a91c158a-b4eb-405f-bf7d-7704d7fb171b@att.net>
 <3eWOtn8set0bbtkUXb-j7rUUTKk@jntp>
 <7acd4175-a69c-4d36-ad23-5bf952f8e6ea@att.net>
 <Pf_iGWdEzYuR1oKepOXxD-daK7M@jntp> <uv4g8q$jm4l$1@i2pn2.org>
 <uv4h87$gafg$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: moebius@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 03:37:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b228f52b1685f368346e875f7c688361";
	logging-data="777602"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+X2kBU7jQmCT0ASO6qO6OT"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nu3f5eGZLBCBnZtb+/mYqjz8uug=
In-Reply-To: <uv4h87$gafg$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2020

Am 10.04.2024 um 00:59 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> On 4/9/2024 3:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>> Multiplying ANY Natural numbers (which are all finite) by two, results 
>> in another finite Natural Number.
> 
> Right! And this new natural number is already in the set of all natural 
> numbers. Why can't WM get this! God damn.

His brain (or "mind") can't deal with (the concept of) "ininite sets", 
that's why. It's clearly a mental deficiency.