Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uv5gfd$qum1$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Recursion, Yo Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:52:13 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <uv5gfd$qum1$1@dont-email.me> References: <uut24f$2icpb$1@dont-email.me> <uutqd2$bhl0$1@i2pn2.org> <uv2u2a$41j5$1@dont-email.me> <87edbestmg.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <uv4r9e$mdd3$1@dont-email.me> <uv5e3l$q885$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:52:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7ce03bb5457ab82bf7e463e8fecedba8"; logging-data="883393"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vXy2eLM0xd/RFAmfCqcbs" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oMnUf76G54o6qrBCTFSOF+yE9yE= Bytes: 1839 On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:11:49 +0200, David Brown wrote: > It is not much used in practice, AFAIK. For some cases the code > generation for nested functions was fine and straight-forward. In other > cases, however, it required a trampoline generated on the stack, and > that became a real pain once non-executable stacks came into fashion. That would be true of those other languages that require the feature, too. > Nested functions were never as interesting for C++ as you already have > better mechanisms for controlling scope and data access - classes and > their methods, including nested classes. Python does both. Just because you have classes doesn’t mean functions can’t be first-class objects, too.