Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.omega.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Eclipse
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:24:50 -0500
Organization: TNet Consulting
Message-ID: <uv67fi$t1b$3@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References: <uv1i45$3mq9q$1@dont-email.me> <147267@dontemail.com>
 <q4ua1jditiklhrj4fuvnkdkc6dh7l7hmne@4ax.com>
 <661629e7$2$1258338$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:24:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="omega.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.1.140";
	logging-data="29739"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <661629e7$2$1258338$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Bytes: 1548
Lines: 13

On 4/10/24 00:55, bitrex wrote:
> The return of the IR doesn't feel linear either, at some point as 
> coverage wanes it feels like it ramps up from not much to 100% over 
> about 30 seconds.

I noticed that the speed of light change was faster at apex and slower 
away from the apex.  I don't know how to describe mathematically much 
less graph it.  It almost seems like a graph of cosine where the X axis 
is the percentage of light.



-- 
Grant. . . .