Article <uv7a8n$18qf8$3@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <uv7a8n$18qf8$3@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<uv7a8n$18qf8$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Recursion, Yo
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 00:18:31 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <uv7a8n$18qf8$3@dont-email.me>
References: <uut24f$2icpb$1@dont-email.me> <uutqd2$bhl0$1@i2pn2.org>
	<uv2u2a$41j5$1@dont-email.me> <87edbestmg.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	<uv4r9e$mdd3$1@dont-email.me> <uv5e3l$q885$1@dont-email.me>
	<uv5gfd$qum1$1@dont-email.me> <uv5lgl$s6uj$1@dont-email.me>
	<uv61f6$v1jm$1@dont-email.me> <uv68ok$11080$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 02:18:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d2a2395bdbcba38bc0f5ee97a1706bee";
	logging-data="1337832"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/erY9PWkr2oqOTZhE7b0KR"
User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qXoJFuy2Dgz8HxVhoUIbZtAS3mI=
Bytes: 1626

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:46:43 +0200, David Brown wrote:

> Just for your entertainment, with C++ lambdas this is now legal code:
> 
> void foo(void) {
> 	[](){}();
> }

C programmer still has habit of writing “(void)” when C++ allows “()” 
instead.

Does the latest C spec now also take “()” to mean “no args” (synonymous 
with “(void)”) instead of “unspecified args”?