Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Meet U.N. "Climate Advisor" Ayisha Siddiqa...
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:54:38 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 141
Message-ID: <uv8tje$1o5ae$4@dont-email.me>
References: <iQmdneoaIp7hh5P7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <uv3gvc$8i1o$1@dont-email.me> <vhidnQFZ97fC7Yj7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <uv4p4e$ibmh$1@dont-email.me> <FISdnYGvraD8aYj7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f14c07bd1c043ae1205005d2e0a70171";
	logging-data="1840462"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+J9abQH/aAjRp8JZlqcjjn"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xP2/VfBGUqaWx0e4CiwLXf4A9dc=
In-Reply-To: <FISdnYGvraD8aYj7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 7704

On 4/9/24 10:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:13:48 PM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/9/24 12:44 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:48:25 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 4/8/24 4:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     In article <uv0vg6$3hsmc$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 4/5/24 3:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>     FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>     On 4/4/24 8:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>     In article <uuneea$uqll$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     On 4/4/24 3:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>     In article <uum8rd$ln18$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     On 4/3/24 11:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Ayisha Siddiqa (@Ayishas12), a climate adviser for the UN.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1775191286032523366?s=20
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     She claims the "white man" and "capitalism" are responsible for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     bringing life to "the verge of extinction" and calls white men
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     killers, looters, and abusers. Her account is filled with hateful
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     anti-white posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Apparently, it's totally fine to be disgustingly racist against
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     white people if you work at the United Nations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     Why are we funding these racist clowns with our tax dollars? The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     United States should simply withdraw from the U.N., send these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     bigoted assholes back to their shithole countries, and retrofit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     U.N. Plaza to house our homeless veterans.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     Libs of Tik Tok. That's all I need to say.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     Because posting other people's self-owns somehow invalidates those
>>>>>>>>>>>     self-owns.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Posting racists and book banners, you mean.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     Ayisha Siddiqa is a racist, I'll grant you, but what books has she
>>>>>>>>>     banned?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     "Raichik has left up scores of tweets denying the existence of systemic
>>>>>>>>     racism.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Cool. Now answer the question I asked.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     The day after Juneteenth 2021, Raichikšs account posted a
>>>>>>>>     callout to her followers, asking them to reply with one word and she
>>>>>>>>     would try to find a video saying why that word is racist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     So she finds various videos from leftists claiming almost any word you can
>>>>>>>     think of is racist and she's racist for posting them?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Oooo-kay, Jan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>     So now you're a racist if you don't automatically agree with whatever
>>>>>     racism claims leftist make? That's in an interesting take. Insane, but
>>>>>     interesting.
>>>>>     
>>>>   Nope. I forgot you can't read. "She's racist because she holds racist
>>>>   opinions." is a simple concept to grasp, even for you.
>>>   
>>>   What opinion of hers is racist?
>>>   
>>>>>   Slate scrolled through thousands of Raichik's tweets, including hundreds of
>>>>>   deleted tweets, to understand how one real estate agent could gain such
>>>>>   clout and to try to discern her next targets. One notable trend was clear:
>>>>>   Raichik’s feed is colored by an intense hostility to liberals generally, but
>>>>>   she holds an especially pronounced animosity toward LGBTQ people, city
>>>>>   dwellers, and black people who have been killed at the hands of police.
>>>>
>>>>>   The same week that Raichik said she started "the tik tok thing", Minneapolis
>>>>>   police officer Derek Chauvin was convicted of murdering George Floyd. Prior
>>>>>   to his conviction, Raichik had focused on a different flavor of right-wing
>>>>>   content under other usernames. But around the time the verdict came down,
>>>>>   Raichik let her apparent views on police violence be known: Floyd was a
>>>>>   criminal and his death was the result of drug use, not Chauvin's brutality,
>>>>>   she made clear in a series of tweets.
>>>   
>>>   That's actually true. Saint Floyd's cause of death was a drug overdose.
>>>   
>>>>>   Raichik’s apparent hostility for black victims of police violence didn't end
>>>>>   with Floyd. She also tweeted repeatedly mocking the killing of 16-year-old
>>>>>   Ma'Khia Bryant, and in another video, the account endorsed random police
>>>>>   brutality.
>>>>
>>>>   So you can go right out and fuck right off.  She's a goddamned racist
>>>>   because she holds racist opinions.
>>>>
>>>>   Just. Like. I. Proved.
>>>   
>>>   You proved nothing other than Slate has called her a racist. They say they
>>>   found racist tweets but then said they were deleted, so we conveniently
>>> can't
>>>   see all this racism they claim exists.
>>>   
>>>   And then they, like you, claim that just denying the existence of 'systemic
>>>   racism' is itself racist. If that's what Slate (and you) consider racism,
>>> then
>>>   you're both full of shit.
>>>   
>>>   Oh, and by the way, just as you constantly dismiss things based on the bias
>>> of
>>>   the messenger, you're going to have to come up with something better than
>>>   Slate if you want to actually prove anything because-- according to Effa's
>>> Own
>>>   Rules-- Slate is a very biased messenger, which nothing they say is
>>>   trustworthy and you've proved nothing.
>>>   
>>>
>> You can see the old tweets just fine, Dumbo.
>>
>>
>> https://www.queerty.com/libs-tiktok-deletes-thousands-tweets-owner-exposed-internet-remembers-forever-20220420
> 
> Queerty.com... that's all I need to say.
> 
> (Hey, this is fun! Just dismiss a source because it's biased and there's no
> need to go any further. Thanks for this rule, Effa!)
> 
> 

Well, you just dismiss reporting because feels...

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0