Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.sf.fandom
Subject: Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who?
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:35:01 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <uv93fl$1pbbb$2@dont-email.me>
References: <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <Ubu357$2pcag$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>
 <LWAt+0A$KtFmFwaD@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk> <uv8g7i$1l880$2@dont-email.me>
 <1354982695.734545394.097383.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:35:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="18a3092a2b68c58c2684343239117f39";
	logging-data="1879403"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18w/b1r2cbSHZPHVQzJMtZ7WAfiHm5lXU8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RF7mKKDNBJQ2qXqSPBGI17rL2Iw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1354982695.734545394.097383.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
Bytes: 2113

On 4/11/2024 12:29 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>
>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>
>> Late 1970's to the early 1980's.
> 
> JINX you owe me ice cream

The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which
you first encounter the show.

pt