Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Bayes in your Luggage
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:38:44 +0200
Message-ID: <uvaktj$fdsf$1@solani.org>
References: <uv7b5v$dtk9$2@solani.org>
 <aihf1j51mbm2t7rhhin61hl57rhh25l1nt@4ax.com> <uv9i5r$etdh$1@solani.org>
 <901h1j5iq6e0dt77tjigjhpoej7bdb8ku4@4ax.com> <uvake2$fdkq$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 06:38:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="505743"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dUVO7EDn26mSuZV9Asu6PrmiUHk=
X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLlCcDOYUS/xJ2F4aD+RwBDwZrM1IzHaZgvhhB3aYw7ZmuF7s1TOUK+lg/8TWgvbkz8gM6hRVh
In-Reply-To: <uvake2$fdkq$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 2475
Lines: 38

Now digging into George Chapline again.
There is not much neuromorphic stuff in
his downloadable publications on resarch gate.

Maybe this one is related:

> In this paper we consider the question whether a 
distributed network of sensors and data processors
can form "perceptions" based on the sensory data.
Because sensory data can have exponentially many
explanations, the use of a central data processor
to analyze the outputs from a large ensemble of
sensors will in general introduce unacceptable
latencies for responding to dangerous situations.
A better idea is to use a distributed "Helmholtz
machine" architecture in which the collective state
of the network as a whole provides an explanation
for the sensory data.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2217832_Sentient_Networks

Could be a new hobby of George Chapline, the
neuromorphic stuff, after rotating universes
and black holes.

Mild Shock schrieb:
> 
> Yeah, of course, in a vulgar setting, a
> stone is a stone, quite unlike what a
> petrologist sees in a stone.
> 
> But of course we shouldn't shy away the
> youngers right now, they might miss their
> dream career, just tell them math isn’t
> 
> scary and science is fun.
> 
> John schrieb:>   Does it really matter? A good book is a good book
> and learning is learning. Maths is always fun.