Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uve0tu$315gn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Arkalen <arkalen@proton.me> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Life: Turn it upside down! Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:22:06 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <uve0tu$315gn$1@dont-email.me> References: <uv3bk0$79c9$1@dont-email.me> <uv3dk7$7pdd$1@dont-email.me> <uv3sco$bgum$1@dont-email.me> <uv40ng$ciks$1@dont-email.me> <uv4cm7$fj9s$1@dont-email.me> <uv5daj$q99f$1@dont-email.me> <uv5luj$sato$1@dont-email.me> <uv5nvn$sqm2$1@dont-email.me> <uv621m$vbun$1@dont-email.me> <uv8p9t$1naae$1@dont-email.me> <uvdir4$2ua8r$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="35697"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:1IuxPSIbx7mPEpRtPSAvWf6Sf4E= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id E45E122976C; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:21:58 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B772B229758 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 09:21:56 -0400 (EDT) id C1B1E7D12B; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay.zaccari.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEAF7D129 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 13:22:08 +0000 (UTC) id 65847DC01A9; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:22:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 15:22:07 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <uvdir4$2ua8r$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18nDsTr1US67xOUROWfSyeRHHHmjeLG5dU= Bytes: 4721 On 13/04/2024 11:21, Ernest Major wrote: > On 11/04/2024 14:41, Arkalen wrote: >>>> I agree those are much more similar than I'd been thinking; I was >>>> thinking of viruses as they are outside of the cell but you're right >>>> that when you consider their activity inside of the cell then >>>> there's much less reason to say that activity isn't "metabolism". >>>> Except for that whole "meta" part of "metabolism" : does mimivirus >>>> do catabolism? Do intracellular parasites? >>>> >>>> I'll look it up after posting but I notice you point out the >>>> difference that intracellular parasites have their own cytoplasm. I >>>> will hazard the guess that this means they have their own >>>> *membranes*, and further hazard the guess that they use respiration >>>> to generate a proton motive force across that membrane to regenerate >>>> ATP. I could see it if they didn't, after all they can get ATP from >>>> the host cell can't they. But if they do, that would be metabolism >>>> with the "meta". >>> >>> Microsporidia have lost the ability to generate their own ATP. The >>> same is said of Giardia. >> >> Do you have a cite on that? This paper suggests that Giardia does have >> metabolism, using fermentation (but then maybe it varies by Giardia >> species, this paper seems to be looking at one specific one): >> >> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC88984/ >> >> It explicitly describes it as generating its own ATP unless I'm >> seriously missing something: >> >> "However, certain eukaryotes, including Trichomonas spp., Entamoeba >> spp., and Giardia spp., are characterized by their lack of >> mitochondria and cytochrome-mediated oxidative phosphorylation. They >> rely on fermentative metabolism (even when oxygen is present) for >> energy conservation. Glycolysis and its brief extensions generate ATP, >> with generation dependent only on substrate level phosphorylation." >> > > I'd misinterpreted this, by not paying sufficient attention to the > context of a statement "but there is no ATP production". > > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8404698/ > > In my defence, your mention of respiration above distracted me from > considering non-mitochondrial (non-respiratory) ATP production. Not all > intracellular parasites act as you proposed, but I overstepped the mark > in baldly stating that they don't produce ATP. To further strengthen your defense, when I made that comment about membranes I had also forgotten there were other ways of making ATP :)