Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than
 Android when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:52:38 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 90
Message-ID: <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me>
 <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:52:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="89e3495ed2f176c77822c3ce87ef54e2";
	logging-data="477737"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19WB89TyRFFBEhfeUGuXM56jpyOnY8kLSc="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O1+7qKc3WznwATLIx4I2gM/R1L4=
	sha1:OhAeBwKBbW/OQhTE5v0bU3mqO3Y=
Bytes: 4740

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>> Chris wrote:
>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases,
>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  -  in most civilised
>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a
>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Not morally.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've
>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one
>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women,
>>>> 
>>>> What the fuck does that mean?
>>>> 
>>>>> then why wasn't
>>>>> he criminally prosecuted?
>>>> 
>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially
>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the
>>>> CJS for a long time.
>>> 
>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL!
>>> 
>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false.
>> 
>> Spoken like a true misogynist.
> 
> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein.

He got what he deserved. Maybe you want to join him?

>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd
>> prefer the wild west.
>> 
>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples.
>>>> 
>>>> Notable you didn't answer this.
>>> 
>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
>>> if you really want to get into that debate.
>> 
>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.
> 
> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.

No one needs vigilantes. 

>> When everyone is carrying a gun
> 
> But not everyone carries a gun.

It wasn't meant literally.