Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uvka8l$17msm$1@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: how
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:38:13 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <uvka8l$17msm$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <uv7609$n6lm$2@i2pn2.org>
 <0i01kKYhCcWwtJURV35AV3Oy16s@jntp>
 <44eaef1b-35be-4b50-900b-52b010ba9aa0@att.net>
 <_g9BcdiKQ1epFrcvM4FSF2rZkN8@jntp>
 <f4890eb5-e8df-4d98-a1ba-98c40f516df5@att.net>
 <HowGC2OIbH3GwJcRQBgR51F0vzM@jntp> <uvdvua$vnmp$1@i2pn2.org>
 <7FlE2ap2lYCEKbW6F4ekYb8aZ3s@jntp> <uvhaem$13m07$2@i2pn2.org>
 <Ru_AyGwfW3klmHhb6sjmxQ_4eqw@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:38:13 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1301398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <Ru_AyGwfW3klmHhb6sjmxQ_4eqw@jntp>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2181
Lines: 35

On 4/15/24 7:47 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 14/04/2024 à 21:23, Richard Damon a écrit :
> 
>> Every Natural Number has aleph_0 numbers above it, one of which will 
>> be double it.
> 
> All natnumbers have no natnumbers following them. Doubling all cannot be 
> absorbed by existing natnumbers.

All Natural Numbers are a series without end, all have an INFINTE number 
of Natural Numbers following them.

Doubling IS absorbed by the existing Natural Numbers.

Name a Natural Number that can not be doubled!!!

Just try to.

> 
>> Thus, doubling ALL the Natural Numbers still gives you results that 
>> are all Natural Numbers.
> 
> Impossible, since all are doubled.

POSSIBLE!!!!

That is the "miracle" of INFINITY. It doesn't act like your finite logic 
incorrect presumes.

Your mind is just too small to understand this.

You logic just blows up when it tries to deal with something bigger than it.

> 
> Regards, WM