Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uvkamq$hf1v$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: how Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:45:46 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 52 Message-ID: <uvkamq$hf1v$1@dont-email.me> References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <uv7609$n6lm$2@i2pn2.org> <0i01kKYhCcWwtJURV35AV3Oy16s@jntp> <44eaef1b-35be-4b50-900b-52b010ba9aa0@att.net> <_g9BcdiKQ1epFrcvM4FSF2rZkN8@jntp> <f4890eb5-e8df-4d98-a1ba-98c40f516df5@att.net> <HowGC2OIbH3GwJcRQBgR51F0vzM@jntp> <29c99292-805f-4f34-a1c8-ce1c7cd82f75@att.net> <WUdrtFzAGxMxA0R9q5J6yKSUZZk@jntp> <uvhdlb$3qhdi$1@dont-email.me> <yEN9mcjNSFCpZauAmq9PZpqTvbE@jntp> <uvj8dn$9pp1$1@dont-email.me> <uvjuoq$etvf$1@dont-email.me> <uvk1pa$fjol$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:45:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8bbe6702323a2c8dcfc05821f328ef73"; logging-data="572479"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/MOLQ5ubF9R2taPxOoEOj90BYXVMxw/4o=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:eSJm0ZdPAE/OOYhizcSqd8R2T3o= In-Reply-To: <uvk1pa$fjol$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2869 On 4/15/2024 1:13 PM, Tom Bola wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson drivels: > >> On 4/15/2024 6:00 AM, Tom Bola wrote: >>> WM drivels: >>> >>>> Le 14/04/2024 à 22:17, Tom Bola a écrit : >>>>> WM schrieb: >>>>> >>>>>> Le 13/04/2024 à 21:16, Jim Burns a écrit : >>>>>>> On 4/13/2024 8:35 AM, WM wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> What elements of {1, 2, 3, ..., ω}*2 >>>>>>>> fall between ω and ω*2? >>>>>>>> Their distances must be 2. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why 2 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Doubling of ordinals >>>>> >>>>> The smallest ordinals behind all n in IN possible >>>>> would be the w's in something like >>>>> >>>>> {0, 1, 2, 3, ..., w, w+1, w+2, w+3, ... w+w} >>>>> >>>>> which, under f(n)=n*2, has the image >>>>> >>>>> {0, 2, 4, 6, ..., w*2, w*2+2, w*2+4, w*2+4, ... w*2+w*2} >>>> >>>> Right! But ω remains like 6 remains. >>> >>> No - w in the domain is related by the function to w*2, >>> same as every other element in the domain: >>> >>> 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., w, w+1, w+2, w+3, ... w+w >>> | | | | ||| | | | | | >>> 0, 2, 4, 6, ..., w*2, w*2+2, w*2+4, w*2+6, ... w*2+w*2 >>> >>> Anyhow - your "doubling" idea is childish and idiotic bullshit, as always. >> >> Ditto! > > ROFL - I haven't got any "doubling" idea for a list of the IN u {w}. Where was I disagreeing with you? > > Morons like you "double it all"...