Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 01:10:16 -0400
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <uvl17o$mdmk$2@news.mixmin.net>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me> <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvjio8$c3i3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:10:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc";
	logging-data="734932"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uvjio8$c3i3$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5206
Lines: 102

Alan wrote:
> On 2024-04-14 20:06, Anonymous wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong. Ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> business partner.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  -  in most 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> civilised
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case 
>>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not morally.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've
>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one
>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women,
>>>>>
>>>>> What the fuck does that mean?
>>>>>
>>>>>> then why wasn't
>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted?
>>>>>
>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially
>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the
>>>>> CJS for a long time.
>>>>
>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL!
>>>>
>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false.
>>>
>>> Spoken like a true misogynist.
>>
>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein.
> 
> What exactly—in your humble opinion—"happened" to Harvey Weinstein?

Why should some slut be allowed to go to the authorities after YEARS
AND YEARS and cry "rape"?

>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd
>>> prefer the wild west.
>>>
>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples.
>>>>>
>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this.
>>>>
>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
>>>> if you really want to get into that debate.
>>>
>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.
>>
>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.
>>
>>> When everyone is carrying a gun
>>
>> But not everyone carries a gun.
> 
> The simple fact is:
> 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate#/media/File:2019_Gun_ownership_rates_and_gun_homicide_rates_-_developed_world_-_scatter_plot.svg>
> 
> Deal with it.
> 

Do you think that someone is more dead after having been shot with a
gun?

And why the focus on the "developed world"? Mexico has fierce gun laws
and a much higher murder rate.