Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 01:10:37 -0400 Organization: Mixmin Message-ID: <uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net> References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me> <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me> <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net> <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net> <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net> <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net> <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net> <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me> <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net> <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:10:39 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc"; logging-data="734932"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4806 Lines: 95 Chris wrote: > Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote: >> Chris wrote: >>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote: >>>> Chris wrote: >>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote: >>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases, >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist - in most civilised >>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a >>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not morally. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've >>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one >>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS. >>>>>> >>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women, >>>>> >>>>> What the fuck does that mean? >>>>> >>>>>> then why wasn't >>>>>> he criminally prosecuted? >>>>> >>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially >>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the >>>>> CJS for a long time. >>>> >>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL! >>>> >>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false. >>> >>> Spoken like a true misogynist. >> >> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein. > > He got what he deserved. Maybe you want to join him? No he didn't. Maybe you should be rape hoaxed. >>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd >>> prefer the wild west. >>> >>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe >>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or >>>>>>>> anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples. >>>>> >>>>> Notable you didn't answer this. >>>> >>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one, >>>> if you really want to get into that debate. >>> >>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no >>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men. >> >> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society. > > No one needs vigilantes. Self-defense is not vigilantism. >>> When everyone is carrying a gun >> >> But not everyone carries a gun. > > It wasn't meant literally. > > > > >