Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than
 Android when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 06:48:16 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 94
Message-ID: <uvl6vg$qd7i$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me>
 <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:48:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="67fadaf73e1d5a25b07d3c9a875da505";
	logging-data="865522"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bvLpeDweeXt1wPRgxmABdMvne90PtHwg="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LMePgjsHU5olF0Ko7ngaR97OrqE=
	sha1:mUeUquTv89XuC4f+s9IVyFPWWgw=
Bytes: 5247

Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>> Chris wrote:
>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  -  in most civilised
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Not morally.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've
>>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one
>>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What the fuck does that mean?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> then why wasn't
>>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially
>>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the
>>>>>> CJS for a long time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false.
>>>> 
>>>> Spoken like a true misogynist.
>>> 
>>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein.
>> 
>> He got what he deserved. Maybe you want to join him?
> 
> No he didn't. Maybe you should be rape hoaxed.

You're getting incoherent. Are the drugs wearing off?

>>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd
>>>> prefer the wild west.
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate.
>>>> 
>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.
>>> 
>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.
>> 
>> No one needs vigilantes.
> 
> Self-defense is not vigilantism.

Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence". Its weakness.
Billions of people are quite capable of not becoming a victim without
needing guns for "self-defence".