Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uvmkco$2fih$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Re:Predictive failures
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 15:43:17 -0400
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <uvmkco$2fih$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <uvjn74$d54b$1@dont-email.me> <uvjobr$dfi2$1@dont-email.me> <uvkn71$ngqi$2@dont-email.me> <uvkrig$30nb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <uvl2gr$phap$2@dont-email.me> <uvm7f5$pvu$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <uvmaet$1231i$2@dont-email.me> <uvmca4$up7$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <uvmjmt$140d2$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:43:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="81489"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YB8X4gXZMWfMRkd6obdBEDBHtX0= sha256:/bjwCpWxnJvxff7xplcHKp6gERkep7orcDJ2fyU9gc4=
	sha1:uONfzVEF5/8h7RaeP8WnInKXUek= sha256:91az8hMc6/mvdFezPo4Qby/sF49uDNEUII1qt58jcjE=
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Bytes: 2539

"Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message 
news:uvmjmt$140d2$1@dont-email.me...
> On 4/16/2024 10:25 AM, Edward Rawde wrote:
>>>> Better to inform the individual who can get the replacement done when 
>>>> the
>>>> tenant isn't even home.
>>>
>>> So, a WiFi/BT link to <whatever>?  Now the simple smoke detector starts
>>> suffering from feeping creaturism.  "Download the app..."
>>
>> No thanks. I have the same view of cameras.
>> They won't be connecting outbound to a server anywhere in the world.
>> But the average user does not know that and just wants the pictures on 
>> their
>> phone.
>
> There is no need for a manufacturer to interpose themselves in such
> "remote access".  Having the device register with a DDNS service
> cuts out the need for the manufacturer to essentially provide THAT
> service.

Not for most users here.
They tried to put me on lsn/cgnat not long ago.
After complaining I was given a free static IPv4.
Most users wouldn't know DDNS from a banana, and will expect it to work out 
of the box after installing the app on their phone.

>
>...