Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Bad reporting Hazards to Homeless article
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:40:07 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <uvofv7$1jt55$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uve3ca$31lpn$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-BDA78A.12190413042024@news.giganews.com>
 <20240413162248.000059fe@example.com>
 <batm1j9c5m41lb8ugd3697qd4q3jc8jt90@4ax.com>
 <20240414115816.00002f6c@example.com>
 <atropos-FAF855.12104814042024@news.giganews.com>
 <17c68b3bbff3bbdb$39147$3340453$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
 <atropos-577C3E.13325215042024@news.giganews.com>
 <uvlpcv$u7hv$4@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-BC8B0B.12080116042024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:40:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f4dcf440bda917fc6282bcb1c6f6d96";
	logging-data="1701029"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/C/KZhUG6SKqhQwFGb0vdW"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5jwQYKoOKIFBUAKBGW8d8CmmJiU=
In-Reply-To: <atropos-BC8B0B.12080116042024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5002

On 4/16/24 3:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uvlpcv$u7hv$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/15/24 4:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <17c68b3bbff3bbdb$39147$3340453$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>    moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/14/2024 3:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <20240414115816.00002f6c@example.com>,
>>>>>     Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 23:20:47 -0700
>>>>>> The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:22:48 -0400, Rhino
>>>>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If the homeless were allowed agency, there would inevitably be
>>>>>>>> pressure to hold them accountable for their actions. That would
>>>>>>>> undermine the "progressive" Saviours who are going to fix everything
>>>>>>>> with vast new and expensive - and almost certainly futile - programs
>>>>>>>> to help the poor darlings. It's far better to just declare them all
>>>>>>>> to be helpless captives of their addictions and mental health so
>>>>>>>> that "help" can be applied in whatever fashion the government and
>>>>>>>> their agents in the civil service deem necessary. Many many billions
>>>>>>>> of tax dollars can then be wasted on schemes that won't solve the
>>>>>>>> problem but WILL enrich the agencies that run the schemes.
>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>> You're suggesting forcible confinement in mental health facilities
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, no, I was not even *thinking* of doing that.
>>>>>
>>>>> You may not be, but I am. If you're violently mentally ill, walking
>>>>> around threatening people and attacking them, you need to be removed
>>>>> from society. If your illness is such that treatment is ineffective,
>>>>> then you stay there forever. But there's no reason the rest of us should
>>>>> have to run the risk of being attacked, stabbed, set on fire, whatever
>>>>> your delusions are telling you to do just going about our daily lives.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, there is *some* reason we run such risks: we give personal
>>>> freedom the benefit of doubt under necessarily imperfect diagnoses.
>>>
>>> A mentally ill guy diagnoses himself perfectly when he violently attacks
>>> someone. At that point we know something must be done about him that
>>> involves removing him from society. The only question is whether that
>>> removal is permanent or not.
>>>
>> Kinda like attacking cops with flagpole spears? Like that kind of
>> violent attacks?
> 
> They were actually arrested and put them in prison, weren't they?
> 
> If only our Democrat 'leaders' in California would do the same to our
> violent nutbags. I guess arrest only comes when the violent attacker has
> different politics than a leftist. If you're down with the Agenda, you
> can do whatever you want in Democrat-controlled California.
> 

Not the people BEHIND it.  They're either in office, or running for office.

So, the answer is "no".  They weren't arrested and put in prison.  The 
flunkies and patsies were... and not even most of them.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0