Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uvp5t2$1oghe$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: how
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:54:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <uvp5t2$1oghe$3@dont-email.me>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp>
 <f4890eb5-e8df-4d98-a1ba-98c40f516df5@att.net>
 <HowGC2OIbH3GwJcRQBgR51F0vzM@jntp> <uvdvua$vnmp$1@i2pn2.org>
 <7FlE2ap2lYCEKbW6F4ekYb8aZ3s@jntp> <uvhaem$13m07$2@i2pn2.org>
 <Ru_AyGwfW3klmHhb6sjmxQ_4eqw@jntp> <uvka8l$17msm$1@i2pn2.org>
 <LUy8jnMOftjltS3mdpX3WN5LLNg@jntp> <uvn1hl$1arkt$1@i2pn2.org>
 <FRTfqq_z2PHTFM_G-AaKQuOXTiQ@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e2583a017ace5d616772eafd574ebb78";
	logging-data="1851950"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186VFhfptb94tidNRyjwkvjStyTd4zYc1A="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KcMMy4U5RLp2KvBpzzDG6Vu0V5E=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <FRTfqq_z2PHTFM_G-AaKQuOXTiQ@jntp>
Bytes: 2411

On 4/17/2024 11:49 AM, WM wrote:
> Le 17/04/2024 à 01:27, Richard Damon a écrit :
>> On 4/16/24 10:59 AM, WM wrote:
> 
>> Note, no "Natural Number" is actually infinite, that distinction falls 
>> on omega. But the SET of the Natural Numbers is Actually Infinite in 
>> Size, having a size of Aleph_0.
> 
> The size of ℕ is |ω|. That means ℕ extends on the ordinal line from 0 to 
> ω. By multiplying every natural number the extendion is doubled. That is 
> mathematics. Every contrary opinion is foolish.
>>
>> Does that mean the Natural Numbers themselves are individually only 
>> "Potentially Infinite" but the set of them is "Actually Infinite" by 
>> your definitions? 
> 
> The visible natural numbers are potentially infinite. The set ℕ is 
> assumed to be actualy infinite. This cannot be known let alone be 
> proven. 

The set of natural numbers is infinite... What is wrong with you, damn it!

;^o



> But we can assume it and draw conclusions. One of them is that 
> nothing fits between all natural numbers and ω.

Rolling eyes....