Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory
Subject: Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:42:45 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <uvpj95$1doq2$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <uvp7rs$1p34r$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 22:42:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1499970"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <uvp7rs$1p34r$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1776
Lines: 21

On 4/17/24 3:27 PM, olcott wrote:
> ...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for a similar
> undecidability proof...(Gödel 1931:43-44)
> 
> *I will paraphrase his quote using the simplest terms*
> 
> Every expression X that cannot possibly be true or false proves that
> there is something wrong with a formal system that cannot correctly
> determine whether X is true or false.
> 
> 

Nope, that is NOT what he means, and shows your utter misunderstanding 
of the logic.

Your WHOLE logic system is just based on STRAWMWN like this, which show 
that you idea about "correct reasoning" are not correct, and are not 
actually based on actual reasoning.

This has been pointed out to you, and your continued repeating them just 
shows your complete stupidity, and that you are nothing but a pitiful 
hypocritical pathologically liar.