Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<uvpt9m$2126r$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.perl.misc Subject: Re: on Perl Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 01:33:42 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <uvpt9m$2126r$1@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87edbtz43p.fsf@tudado.org> <0d2cnVzOmbD6f4z7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <20240408075547.000061e8@gmail.com> <g52cnWOOwoz_son7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uvbe3m$2cun7$1@dont-email.me> <Mkidnafag8vlooH7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <pan$c8c3e$b0e492b3$c544c27e$d72bff90@invalid.invalid> <uvk8o6$h2pg$3@dont-email.me> <dRicnfsW0phufoP7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uvnerd$1ct1p$1@dont-email.me> <87jzkvor7q.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <uvplme$1rupi$2@dont-email.me> <87le5br16d.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 03:33:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec6fcf3bb75b95711759fde7cd91a1dc"; logging-data="2132187"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+C9CB86pX2qbskVFiY0fMr" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MRswq89Z0CAwnAw6Z95cEkLsnjw= Bytes: 2075 On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:59:06 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: >> >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:04:57 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>> >>> Perl has had support for object-oriented programming (with multiple >>> inheritance) for many years -- too many for me to remember. >> >> Then why this new “class” thing in 5.38? > > It's explained reasonably well at the top of the "perldoc perlclass" > documentation in Perl 5.38: It says there is already supposed to be a mechanism for this, it doesn’t explain why that isn’t good enough.