Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:50:36 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <uvrbvs$2acf7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uvq0sg$21m7a$1@dont-email.me> <uvq359$1doq3$4@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:50:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a1f32e60dc08f78f1ab1571cf690fea5";
	logging-data="2437607"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+O1WvM4Q0xiZ2ZbiqLhU6y"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0MY9z8r/95aWcQ0QQ9eXkkcvUxw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uvq359$1doq3$4@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3155

On 4/17/2024 10:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 4/17/24 10:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>> ...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for a similar
>> undecidability proof...(Gödel 1931:43-44)
>>
>> *Parphrased as*
>> Every expression X that cannot possibly be true or false proves that the
>> formal system F cannot correctly determine whether X is true or false.
>> Which shows that X is undecidable in F.
> 
> Nope.
> 
> Just more of your LIES and STUPIDITY.
> 
>>
>> Which shows that F is incomplete, even though X cannot possibly be a
>> proposition in F because propositions must be true or false.
> 
> But that ISN'T the definition of "Incomplete", so you are just LYING.
> 
> Godel showed that a statment, THAT WAS TRUE, couldn't be proven in F.
> 
> You don't even seem to understand what the statement G actually is, 
> because all you look at are the "clift notes" versions, and don't even 
> understand that.
> 
> Remember, G is a statement about the non-existance of a number that has 
> a specific property. Until you understand that, your continued talking 
> about this is just more LIES and DECIET, proving your absoulute STUPIDITY.
> 
>>
>> A proposition is a central concept in the philosophy of language,
>> semantics, logic, and related fields, often characterized as the primary
>> bearer of truth or falsity.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition
>>
> 
> Right, and if you don't know what the proposition is that you are 
> arguing about, you are just proven to be a stupid liar.
> 

If you are going to continue to be mean and call me names I will stop
talking to you. Even if you stop being mean and stop calling me names
if you continue to dogmatically say that I am wrong without pointing
out all of the details of my error, I will stop talking to you.

This is either a civil debate and an honest dialogue or you will
hear nothing form me.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer