Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:58:44 -0700
Organization: None, as usual
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <uvsq5k$2noa1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me> <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me> <uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvl6vg$qd7i$1@dont-email.me> <uvovgj$1n9rl$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvp09c$1n8ld$2@dont-email.me> <uvqe3n$247bn$1@dont-email.me>
 <6m47fkxdng.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <uvrrc7$2dq38$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvs60u$2gc8s$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:58:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3d5b82ea4beda1268e5f610ef4f6bedd";
	logging-data="2875713"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19pSPYlCvDgTR9O4JWAe9igw4Up/VIC9hE="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/68.0 Thunderbird/68.12.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/jjcf8a6TBbAFQTS+TZ0pS/l/A4=
In-Reply-To: <uvs60u$2gc8s$4@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4485

On 4/18/24 3:14 PM, Alan wrote:
> On 2024-04-18 12:13, The Real Bev wrote:
>> On 4/18/24 2:11 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>> On 2024-04-18 08:20, The Real Bev wrote:
>>>> On 4/17/24 10:18 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-04-17 10:05, The Real Bev wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/15/24 11:48 PM, Chris wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence". Its weaknes=
s.
>>>>>>> Billions of people are quite capable of not becoming a victim wit=
hout
>>>>>>> needing guns for "self-defence".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, screaming I AM NOT A VICTIM at the thug with a knife will=20
>>>>>> definitely send him on his way abashed and save Granny from being =

>>>>>> harmed. Or perhaps you were thinking of the umbrella with the=20
>>>>>> sharpened tip?
>>>>>
>>>>> You still haven't explained why the US has so many more deaths than=

>>>>> other countries similar to it.
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea why.=C2=A0 Do you?=C2=A0 Perhaps we are just violent =
people.
>>>>
>>>> Given that this is true, how do we best protect ourselves when law=20
>>>> enforcement is too far away to be protective?
>>>
>>> The same way as other countries do: by banning weapons. You do not le=
t
>>> violent people easy access to weapons.
>>=20
>> Like Mexico...
>>=20
>> Knives, rebar, baseball bats, tennis rackets, 2x4s...
>>=20
>>>> A few nights ago a guy pulled a knife on a woman, forced her to driv=
e=20
>>>> to a different location and raped her.=C2=A0 This happened a few blo=
cks=20
>>>> away. What should she have done?
>>>
>>> Same as in any modern and evolved country.
>>=20
>> Bend over and smile?
>>=20
>> She was sitting in her car in a restaurant parking lot at 8:30 at nigh=
t=20
>> in a "safe" neighborhood.=C2=A0 He jumped into her car.=C2=A0 Perhaps =
she should=20
>> have locked her doors, but that's alien behavior here.
>>=20
>> If someone threatens you with ANY weapon they have forfeited their rig=
ht=20
>> to decent treatment.=C2=A0 Perhaps no weapon is required if they are=20
>> physically threatening.=C2=A0 We should all be allowed to protect our =
own=20
>> lives.=C2=A0 Period.
>=20
> So again, yes or no:
>=20
> Are you advocating that every person carries a firearm on his or her
> person at all times?

No.  There are a lot of stupid people out there.  But, with certain=20
exceptions, we should have that right.

Apparently this is standard practice for criminals.

--=20
Cheers, Bev
     "...so she told me it was either her or the ham radio, over."