Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <uvsv9e$3de5$1@news1.tnib.de>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<uvsv9e$3de5$1@news1.tnib.de>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news1.tnib.de!feed.news.tnib.de!news.tnib.de!.POSTED.torres.zugschlus.de!not-for-mail
From: Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: I never thought of this scenario
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 07:26:05 +0200
Organization: private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details
Message-ID: <uvsv9e$3de5$1@news1.tnib.de>
References: <uutq04$2n9pt$1@dont-email.me> <07WdnchvLrr2GI_7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <uuu39t$2pd0s$1@dont-email.me> <uuvblp$32mbm$1@dont-email.me> <uv06o4$3c5fm$2@dont-email.me> <uv09ad$3cnth$1@dont-email.me> <uv2e60$jin$1@dont-email.me> <uv3e7p$7nqq$3@dont-email.me> <uvcu20$2qdb0$3@dont-email.me> <uvd5rs$n3n$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <uvht5g$3th0n$3@dont-email.me> <uvhv3k$kq3$2@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <uvs640$2g9b9$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:26:06 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news1.tnib.de; posting-host="torres.zugschlus.de:81.169.166.32";
	logging-data="112069"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@tnib.de"
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Bytes: 2275
Lines: 21

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 20:15:32 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:
>
>> .. when a DHCP client /renews/ it's lease,
>> it has a valid IP address and can use that to talk to the DHCP server on
>> a remote subnet using standard DHCP protocol.
>
>Why would it need to? The DHCP server is on the same subnet, otherwise the 
>client could not have got that address in the first place.

For the unmpteenth time: You don't know enough about DHCP to be a
member of a fruitful discussion about that protocol.

The fact that YOUR DHCP server is on the same subnet of your
residential one-subnet setup does NOT mean that this is the case for
all DHCP deployments.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402