Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:03:41 -0400
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <uvum7e$1eigo$3@news.mixmin.net>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me> <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me> <uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvl6vg$qd7i$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 21:03:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc";
	logging-data="1526296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uvl6vg$qd7i$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5066
Lines: 91

Chris wrote:
> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So is trump. They are much alike and have never done anything wrong. Ever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Neither has ever committed a crime or screwed a customer or business partner.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is provably untrue, in that Trump has already lost two civil cases,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein one of which a jury found him to be a rapist  -  in most civilised
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people's view, that is both committing a crime and screwing someone.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Losing a civil case is not the same as a criminal conviction.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The claim was the he "never done anything wrong". Losing a civil case is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clear case of doing something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No it's not. Anyone can sue anyone for anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And? If the court finds against you you've legally done something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not morally.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Trump has never done anything morally wrong? You've
>>>>>>>>> completely lost any sense of reality.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> At the very least he cheated on two of his wives. He sexually assaulted one
>>>>>>>>> woman (probably more) and he defrauded several banks and the IRS.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If he legitimately "knife to the throat" raped women,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What the fuck does that mean?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> then why wasn't
>>>>>>>> he criminally prosecuted?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like you said yourself the US system doesn't provide justice, especially
>>>>>>> against rich, powerful men. Sexual assault hasn't been treated well by the
>>>>>>> CJS for a long time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, you probably think Jacqueline Coakley was telling the truth. LOL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Forget accusations, most rape _convictions_ are false.
>>>>>
>>>>> Spoken like a true misogynist.
>>>>
>>>> Go read what happened to Harvey Weinstein.
>>>
>>> He got what he deserved. Maybe you want to join him?
>>
>> No he didn't. Maybe you should be rape hoaxed.
> 
> You're getting incoherent. Are the drugs wearing off?
> 
>>>>> Are there any aspects of the law you trust? From here it sounds like you'd
>>>>> prefer the wild west.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
>>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
>>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
>>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
>>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.
>>>>
>>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.
>>>
>>> No one needs vigilantes.
>>
>> Self-defense is not vigilantism.
> 
> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence". 

Yes it is.