Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 10:01:06 +1200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <uvupj2$37h6l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uvd7au$2kc8$4@news.mixmin.net> <nnkafkxbpl.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:01:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="765e1c3df619ea87e80a4f6213dcf9bf";
	logging-data="3392725"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NAmHNKTyA//AwFsSChMmF/TSXbGZn+Zk="
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gfUNQWdcGcvlMp6s6mXcaH0ycfI=
Bytes: 2381

On 2024-04-19 17:03:19 +0000, Carlos E.R. said:
> On 2024-04-19 08:38, Your Name wrote:
>> On 2024-04-19 04:11:19 +0000, The Real Bev said:
>>> On 4/18/24 3:46 PM, Your Name wrote:
>>>> On 2024-04-18 19:13:09 +0000, The Real Bev said:
>>>>> On 4/18/24 2:11 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>> The Swiss and possibly the Israelis are required to own guns.
>> 
>> Nope. Wrong on both.
>> 
>> Swiss law says you *can* own a weapong (with restrictions), but you are 
>> not "required to".
>> 
>>    If you are a Swiss citizen, you are generally permitted
>>    to own a weapon if:
>>      - you are at least 18 years old.
>>      - you are not subject to a general deputyship or are
>>        represented through a care appointee.
>>      - there is no reason to believe you may use the weapon
>>        to harm yourself or others.
>> 
>> The last point of which means you cannot use it to shoot anyone else - 
>> so basically pointless owning a gun, unless you're something like a 
>> duck hunter.
> 
> The purpose being to defend the country from foreign invaders, not 
> yourself from somebody invading your private property, or from any sort 
> of criminal.
> 
> And they get trained.
> ...

The wording of the law does not distinguish any such thing.