Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:01:58 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <uvupkm$37gtn$3@dont-email.me>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvftjc$3gk7l$2@dont-email.me> <uvi4hf$f8km$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvi9vv$3imo$1@dont-email.me> <uvl177$mdmk$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvmgun$13bev$2@dont-email.me> <uvum88$1eigo$5@news.mixmin.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:01:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="558805e71fa3c9fc03b6dea5f4add060";
	logging-data="3392439"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18EYivyZ4UjpBKDW5Ub83TnXeVQnVrQPD4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6LXvYndG7tPTCXSyRoT5xUJhCXI=
In-Reply-To: <uvum88$1eigo$5@news.mixmin.net>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 2526

On 2024-04-19 14:04, Anonymous wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Those are upgraded misdemeanors, because there is allegedly an 
>>>>> UNDERLYING
>>>>> felony. Show us the UNDERLYING felony.
>>>>
>>>> You don't understand the law.
>>>>
>>>> There doesn't have to be an "underlying felony".
>>>>
>>>> There just has to be an underlying crime that the falsification was 
>>>> undertaken in furtherance of.
>>>
>>> Fine, then what was the underlying crime?
>>
>> Federal election contribution crimes.
> 
> And Bragg has no authority to prosecute that. He's pulling shit out
> of his ass.

He doesn't need authority to prosecute those crimes.

The statute simply requires that there ARE crimes that the 
falsifications of business records were intended to cover up.

You agree that Trump did falsify the records, right?

:-)