Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: sticks <wolverine01@charter.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 23:05:40 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <uvveuk$3f8p1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me> <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me> <uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvl6vg$qd7i$1@dont-email.me> <uvum7e$1eigo$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvv1dh$39521$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 06:05:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="668f15a688bf89ef2d1a5623ec5b4267";
	logging-data="3646241"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SUitriE/QYkFdcm5s8Cvh"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Betterbird/102.15.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6qTomrtRpklzgXKkLzjK2q9ssCI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <uvv1dh$39521$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2807

On 4/19/2024 7:14 PM, Chris wrote:
> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/04/2024 01:58, Hank Rogers wrote:

Really?

>>>>>
>>>>> No one needs vigilantes.
>>>>
>>>> Self-defense is not vigilantism.
>>>
>>> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence".
>>
>> Yes it is.
> 
> Nope. It's a pre-meditated act. You're armed with the intention to harm.

Was this intended for rec.humor?  If not, can I forward it?  It's 
fucking hilarious!



-- 
Stand With Israel!