Article <uvvmoi$atth$1@news1.tnib.de>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <uvvmoi$atth$1@news1.tnib.de>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<uvvmoi$atth$1@news1.tnib.de>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news1.tnib.de!feed.news.tnib.de!news.tnib.de!.POSTED.torres.zugschlus.de!not-for-mail
From: Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: I never thought of this scenario
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:18:57 +0200
Organization: private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details
Message-ID: <uvvmoi$atth$1@news1.tnib.de>
References: <uuu39t$2pd0s$1@dont-email.me> <uuvblp$32mbm$1@dont-email.me> <uv06o4$3c5fm$2@dont-email.me> <uv09ad$3cnth$1@dont-email.me> <uv2e60$jin$1@dont-email.me> <uv3e7p$7nqq$3@dont-email.me> <uvcu20$2qdb0$3@dont-email.me> <uvd5rs$n3n$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <uvht5g$3th0n$3@dont-email.me> <uvhv3k$kq3$2@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <uvs640$2g9b9$6@dont-email.me> <uvtek0$2u6or$2@dont-email.me> <uvv1vr$392q8$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 06:18:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news1.tnib.de; posting-host="torres.zugschlus.de:81.169.166.32";
	logging-data="358321"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@tnib.de"
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Bytes: 2044
Lines: 16

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:47:44 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> The key is that the routers between each subnet and the DHCP machine
>> need to be told to route DHCP *in some way*.
>
>Finally, an admission that routability is something that has to be added 
>via a special tunnelling mechanism, it is not part of the actual protocol.
>
>Thank you for admitting what some other parties still refuse to say.

You're reasoning is flawed.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE   |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402