Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [OT] The dumb and the guilty (Was Re: How many ....)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:44:11 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <v009q9$3ks14$1@dont-email.me>
References: <199e94ddd32456be8b7d600a5058347b@dizum.com>
 <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl> <uvttue$2f38$11@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl> <uvupsl$m3g$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:44:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1f3866216da3d4f54a40be508cde07ef";
	logging-data="3829796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xCpBxOuUu0FBrbMVsKTiALv/wgs0qe6I="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GTrt9/fxl+7FDLHZFLdPoJPbJ4c=
In-Reply-To: <uvupsl$m3g$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2697

The Doctor wrote on 20/4/24 8:06 am:
> In article <xn0okrm90ata3to001@post.eweka.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xn0okrbssaf0qei000@post.eweka.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Might have to check your favoutire archive to check your
>>>>> assertion.
>>>>
>>>> My Usenet service provider has retention of rec.arts.drwho
>>>> back to 1st July 2003, that's 747,979 messages (as of
>>>> today)... IF I had the time and patience to go through them
>>>> all I am pretty sure that I could find thousands of messages
>>>> where you were wrong and a way way smaller percentage of
>>>> messages where you was right!
>>>>
>>>> In fact I doubt if the messages where you was right would
>>>> total 1% of those 747,979 messages! But of course, that is
>>>> only a wild guess.
>>>
>>> Does it have a searchable feature?
>>
>> Of course, but why would I search through 21 years of messages
>> to RADW? I'm not a glutton for punishment... or a masochist.
>>
>> RADW is a newsgroup where the discussions generally go round and
>> round in circles, so anything that I've missed through the years
>> will surely be round again at some stage!
> 
> Searchable is what rocks!!
> 
Hey, asswipe, YOU have YOUR own Server. How long is the retention on 
THAT, asswipe?? Maybe YOU, asswipe, could do a search of its files, 
asswipe!!
-- 
Daniel