Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: Code Reuse (was Re: The Continuous Amnesia Issue)
Date: 21 Apr 2024 15:29:10 -0000
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <v03bc6$gh8$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <slrnv1rafb.3l3.bencollver@svadhyaya.localdomain> <uvnf78$1ct1p$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2";
	logging-data="25251"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
Bytes: 1817

Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:34:53 -0000 (UTC), Ben Collver wrote:
>
>> The discussion moved at a level as if nobody ever had said or written a
>> single word about reusability in the past 50 years.
>
>That’s because most of that 50 years was spent talking about it, not 
>actually doing it.

In the eighties, everybody was talking about code reuse and how it would
be the future and how all of our problems would go away.

Not we have people throwing together code that consists entirely of library
calls without actually understanding what those library calls are really doing.

>I think the problem is pretty much solved now. Open Source has become the 
>established way to develop most parts of the software stack (except 
>perhaps the most specialized bits at the top). And code reuse follows very 
>naturally from the ability to share, modify and redistribute other 
>people’s code.

There isn't enough modification and redistribution.  We need to add two
numbers, so why not just link in this giant math library?
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."