Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: [OT] The dumb and the guilty (Was Re: How many ....)
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:09:42 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <v05d14$t0g7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <199e94ddd32456be8b7d600a5058347b@dizum.com>
 <v02966$5fsk$1@dont-email.me> <v0316d$kqb$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <v032ng$aemi$1@dont-email.me> <v03n26$180t$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:09:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="afc5be9c56167fd176da415c53f502fc";
	logging-data="950791"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1889iAQgn3FTHwEx4s6YZb96w1d90W3zuw="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uFRFpdTxcQiVf+nw2S0yLY1pfVs=
In-Reply-To: <v03n26$180t$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2553

The Doctor wrote on 22/4/24 4:48 am:
> In article <v032ng$aemi$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <v02966$5fsk$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>> In article <v00pom$3okjc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The King-in-Yellowbeard wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <uvvfjk$3ff18$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SP - no discernment!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DY - no answers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>>>
>>>>> How thorough is your Bible reading?
>>>>
>>>> I’ll answer your questions when you’ve answered mine.
>>>>
>>>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
>>>
>>> If you answer my question, my answer becomes obvious.
>>
>> If you answer my questions, your answer won’t need to become
>> obvious because it’ll already be obvious!
>>
>> Which facts have I skewed? How have I skewed them?
> 
> There you are not on the correct track.

Gobble-de-gook!!
-- 
Daniel