Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v07062$17r2v$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: I never thought of this scenario Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:42:42 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <v07062$17r2v$4@dont-email.me> References: <uv2g3g$39k$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <uvcu5a$2qdb0$5@dont-email.me> <uvd6m3$n3m$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <uvhtft$3th0n$6@dont-email.me> <uvhv0m$kq3$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <uvs61u$2g9b9$5@dont-email.me> <uvsv4f$3cvv$1@news1.tnib.de> <uvv1qf$392q8$2@dont-email.me> <uvve26$3f4ea$1@dont-email.me> <wwvh6fwxy7q.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <v0108c$3q01h$1@dont-email.me> <v0111s$3q1fd$1@dont-email.me> <v013pv$3qmkf$1@dont-email.me> <v014gp$3qp0c$1@dont-email.me> <v017q3$td0$4@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <v02ona$894n$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:42:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e762e53ec9e8808879f7618c3ddfda81"; logging-data="1305695"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18spgSNDel5LmNNFbrMdxO3" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NFHM5W/zM6MgWOo1ZcGy26U8L+o= Bytes: 2435 On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:10:49 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Calling this action a 'relay agent' makes it all into something it is > not - a separate addition to routers in general. DHCP can be and is > routed by routers. Not without these separate “relay agents”, as even those who try to keep insisting that “DHCP is routable” have already admitted. Routable protocols can make it through routers without the help of special protocol-specific agents. Routers forward layer-3 packets, and whatever is embedded within them is taken along for the ride, transparently. But that requires a properly configured layer 3 in order to work. And that is what DHCP provides. Therefore, since DHCP’s function is to set up layer 3 in the first place (without the requirement for individual node configuration), it cannot rely on the existence of a fully-functioning layer 3 to begin with. Therefore it cannot be routed. QED.