Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v08bu7$1kl1e$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc,comp.unix.shell Subject: Re: on Perl Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:09:27 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <v08bu7$1kl1e$1@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87edbtz43p.fsf@tudado.org> <0d2cnVzOmbD6f4z7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <20240408075547.000061e8@gmail.com> <g52cnWOOwoz_son7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uvbe3m$2cun7$1@dont-email.me> <Mkidnafag8vlooH7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <pan$c8c3e$b0e492b3$c544c27e$d72bff90@invalid.invalid> <uvk8o6$h2pg$3@dont-email.me> <20240415152951.000079ab@gmail.com> <uvkbec$hjeq$1@dont-email.me> <uvlc1f$rgng$1@dont-email.me> <slrnv1smf9.25p4.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <uvlp8g$u62e$1@dont-email.me> <87wmowv9fy.fsf@eder.anydns.info> <20240417080523.00005e99@gmail.com> <uvp6gv$1onkq$1@dont-email.me> <20240417121909.000039a3@gmail.com> <uvp996$1p6tk$1@dont-email.me> <20240417133955.00004d23@gmail.com> <20240417211356.581@kylheku.com> <uvqlnp$25k0u$2@dont-email.me> <uvqm1t$25pds$2@dont-email.me> <uvqp94$26en6$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: richard.harnden@invalid.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2eb1c0cbb2b784c5104653df0f983a94"; logging-data="1725486"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19B73CY1aT+Br/x4PbWcPtLO6XNrljhFC4=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:AvsP9RIEB7a65554qnfANB5k/88= In-Reply-To: <uvqp94$26en6$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2610 On 18/04/2024 10:31, David Brown wrote: > On 18/04/2024 10:36, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:30:49 +0200, David Brown wrote: >> >>> With the list of pointers design of Forth, you can just >>> redefine these "local" words as you need to, and ignore any previous >>> definitions. >> >> So, they reinvented local variables, and thought it was some great >> innovation ... > > "word" in Forth terminology is more like "function" in common imperative > languages. (It is not exactly the same, since Forth "words" are much > more flexible - that is both a good thing and a bad thing.) > Why not include c.l.forth?