Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: how
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:23:01 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <v098rk$1rm51$1@dont-email.me>
References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <uvulr4$36plc$1@dont-email.me>
 <stohwU8_tXR1lFqmbIJKGgksu_Q@jntp> <v00upr$3pm7b$1@dont-email.me>
 <ZBi4zgLNiT37UPa-AXe7ZNaUYVk@jntp> <v01ggs$3tc37$1@dont-email.me>
 <L2UhMbkkW3TeMvDoHPdBrhXFsds@jntp> <v068oc$137lt$1@dont-email.me>
 <hJLbsBln3PsUHAxhjVb27EqPUbo@jntp> <v090b6$1ph3s$1@dont-email.me>
 <QrfMhZS5r9QSREW0yg-NA62Wt2g@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 23:23:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c177552828c211028f410b27a8bc1dd6";
	logging-data="1956001"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1989Fyz2EMB02xLQzLOEqg9DYsZ4TVyT5I="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:T3ovJZs6n0oaRE3Hy6EAvDfJf3c=
In-Reply-To: <QrfMhZS5r9QSREW0yg-NA62Wt2g@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2345

On 4/23/2024 12:13 PM, WM wrote:
> Le 23/04/2024 à 20:57, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>> WM was thinking very hard :
>>> Le 22/04/2024 à 20:02, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>>> WM has brought this to us :
>>>>> Le 21/04/2024 à 00:44, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>>>>> WM wrote :
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is a gap in the ordinals?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a not existing ordinal between two ordinals. It is a not 
>>>>>>> existing natural number next to ω, for instance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sets do not have not existing elements.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is ω - 1?
>>>>
>>>> An absurdity.
>>>
>>> Not more nor less than ω.
>>
>> What is the value of ω?
> 
> It cannot be expressed in units as a finite initial segment of ℕ.

So, you were always missing your largest natural number from the get go? 
You are a moron? WM, sure seems to think that there _is_ a largest 
natural number, he just cannot see it, so, well, it must be dark. lol! 
Your largest natural number is already in the set of all natural numbers!