Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than
 Android when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:57:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <v0bdl1$2eavg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me>
 <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me>
 <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvl6vg$qd7i$1@dont-email.me>
 <uvum7e$1eigo$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvv1dh$39521$1@dont-email.me>
 <v024tm$1mmr6$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <v02sgt$976r$1@dont-email.me>
 <mluhfkx1a8.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:57:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a939694dc1807e1104296b10fbe86c1";
	logging-data="2567152"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18p8wYmitkajAsu7y5iTFI//wJ2WPtRhDA="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KkwsE9xNxl8e3xsdFRmHiwaKvzM=
	sha1:syKICXH/YUna0X9mGpq4gPx3BIo=
Bytes: 3741

Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> On 2024-04-21 13:15, Chris wrote:
>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>> Chris wrote:
>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
>>>>>>>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
>>>>>>>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> No one needs vigilantes.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Self-defense is not vigilantism.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence".
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes it is.
>>>> 
>>>> Nope. It's a pre-meditated act. You're armed with the intention to harm.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Those in the United States who lawfully carry a concealed handgun
>>> hope they never need to use it, but want to be prepared for that
>>> eventuality.
>> 
>> Why? I've been to the US. It isn't as lawless you make out.
>> 
>> As a visitor I'm more worried about getting caught in cross-fire than
>> actually being a victim of crime.
>> 
> 
> 
> Or stepping somewhere and being shot as trespasser :-D

Or if it's the police getting shot for being brown "just in case".