Article <v0if36$9abv$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v0if36$9abv$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v0if36$9abv$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: ? ? ?
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:04:37 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <v0if36$9abv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp>
 <7db883272b0cc7e8a6a272fcd33fabba@www.novabbs.com>
 <urds2c$1e5vm$2@dont-email.me> <l912bvF7gcjU4@mid.individual.net>
 <v0fvin$3l14j$1@dont-email.me> <DCascHb7ksU1r9ZZmmrfvRcjCpo@jntp>
 <v0ic4k$8n83$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:04:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8aa27352a034b4b0e484fc0513249bd1";
	logging-data="305535"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19w+vrPaUQIm6sEOdtkx81R"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:feOpgrF9kNaspTPur4aW2KkmS3E=
In-Reply-To: <v0ic4k$8n83$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1880

Le 27/04/2024 à 10:14, Mikko a écrit :
> On 2024-04-26 17:43:03 +0000, Richard "Hachel" Lengrand said:
> 
>> Mais Hachel dans son immense génie réfute t'_A - t_B = t_B - t_A
> 
> A denial is not a refutation.

Definitely. Moreover this equation is basically a convention that
allows to set up a set of co-moving clocks. To "refute" a convention
you'd have to show it is inconsistent.

It can be shown that this convention IS consistent (i.e. reflexive,
symmetric, transitive). Richard "Hachel" Lengrand's rant is pointless.

Moreover this convention preserves Newton's laws between inertial
frames, while Hachel's various idiotic claims are violating the
principle of Relativity and are contradictory.