Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: How Do We Know?
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 17:57:20 -0400
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <v0jsc1$34lrm$1@news.mixmin.net>
References: <cm8q2jtl07i443hrnb2us5og9k59c12r55@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:57:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c4af4a3027e8317d29ea238d8aa6bb2f616aa3fc";
	logging-data="3299190"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <cm8q2jtl07i443hrnb2us5og9k59c12r55@4ax.com>
Bytes: 1359
Lines: 9

X, formerly known as "!Jones" wrote:
> Definition:
> A *finder of fact* shall be defined as an impartial panel of one or
> more persons designated by the legislative process and sworn under
> oath of office to appraise and publish as a public record the facts
> underlying a particular event or legal matter.  A finder of fact
> employs the scientific method 

....which is incapable of being the sole arbiter of truth. Even when
used properly, it can't even produce consistent scientific evidence.