Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v0k0h5$k8gh$10@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: lots of juice, Short Vectors Versus Long Vectors Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:08:21 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <v0k0h5$k8gh$10@dont-email.me> References: <v06vdb$17r2v$1@dont-email.me> <v0cqbb$2ra8g$2@dont-email.me> <4lnk2jdiligpupetq3cncs2j41mdcpd7l1@4ax.com> <v0e593$34kit$2@dont-email.me> <v0ea7g$2343$1@gal.iecc.com> <v0iolj$bgb6$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 01:08:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="204de98df41bd5ef7b37f05a187c8914"; logging-data="664081"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187myu85SVsPZenKjn4hWJB" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wxKunr7ta1By/lPjW7nPYX1usos= Bytes: 2956 On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 11:48:03 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote: > If people make the claim that GPUs are more power-efficient than CPUs, > yes, they are for equal performance (if they can be programmed > efficiently enough for the application at hand). In practice, this will > not be used for energy savings, but for doing more calculations. “Rebound effect”, I think it’s called. Remember all those science-fiction predictions from the earlier part of the 20th century, about cities on the Moon, personal flying transportation and all the rest of it? All that was predicated on having large sources of power--i.e. atomic power. Instead of having atomic-scale sources of power at our disposal, we got information processing (computers) instead, and almost nobody saw how big a revolution that would be. Meanwhile, the atomic-energy industry seemed to take a wrong turn, putting more effort into power production systems that would also aid the production of atomic weapons, instead of concentrating on predominantly peaceful technologies. Now the information processing power is reaching the limits of the available physical power. The only way to make significant further progress is to start boosting that physical power generation again. > Same thing happend with steam engines - Watt's engines were a huge > improvement in fuel efficiency over the previous Newcomen models, which > led to much more steam engines being built. Watt’s engine (like Newcomen’s one before it) was an “atmospheric” engine: the pressure to drive it came from the atmosphere, not from the steam. True high-pressure “steam” engines were developed by Trevithick and others, after Watt’s patent had expired and he could no longer stop them. And that is what kicked off the Industrial Revolution.