Path: ...!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!168.119.53.7.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: From the Archives .....
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 07:07:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 87
Message-ID: <v0ksjr$tvbj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uvtn5t$30593$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0dlnh$315k9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0e20a$33q13$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0j95d$f6gb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0k0ep$2o6v$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:07:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="00244fbcba50464461ce621178beca66";
	logging-data="982387"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PhmiKR56Bqqd22fzf8KeR/SnqKqiikW8="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b+R6b/SnsT3di4gvTaUHwb/1ep4=
	sha1:VSyX9D9vaDxfyS1fOG+Of0GH+io=
Bytes: 4606


The idiot insisted:

> In article <v0j95d$f6gb$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The unTrue Doctor wrote more untruths:
>> 
>>> On 25/04/2024 14:27, solar idiot wrote:
>>>> The unTrue Doctor has no idea about truth:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> To anyone watching the episode who has never watched Doctor Who before,
>>>>> and doesn't recognize Pertwee let along Hartnell it's made obvious from
>>>>> the start that when Tom Baker's face is not on the screen then he's
>>>>> losing to Morbius and the intention of the director and original script
>>>>> writer is that all the faces the viewer does not recognize are those
>>>>> generated by Morbius of himself as he appeared in the past and in
>>>>> disguise, since it's clearly not Tom Baker.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> If the faces are Morbius, why is he in Victorian/Edwardian clothes
>>>> of the sort associated with the Doctor? Why isn’t he in Time
>>>> Lord robes?
>>> 
>>> Why would he be in Time Lord robes when he was a fugitive from the Time 
>>> Lords?
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> You say he’s ‘in disguise’ but that disguise would make him
>>>> stick out like a sore thumb (maybe even two or three sore thumbs)
>>>> on Gallifrey. Just who is he supposed to be disguised as, and why?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> He wouldn't stick out like a sore thumb if he was living in different 
>>> periods in history, 
>> 
>> Do you think Morbius might’ve been hiding on Victorian/Edwardian
>> Earth? That’s an interesting idea. I’m not sure about the details though.
>> 
>> Did he live live that era just once rapidly getting through all
>> those regenerations one after the other. Or did he keep returning
>> to there, living through it again with each regeneration?
>> 
>>> and who know what Gallifreyans wear outside of the 
>>> Citadel. According to Moffat they all seam to live in barns and dress 
>>> like 18 or 19th century American colonists.
>> 
>> This is seventies Dr Who. They probably dress like the Outsiders
>> in ‘The Invasion of Time’.
>> 
>>> 
>>> What sticks out is that fact than none of the faces shown after 
>>> Hartnell's face is that of a Black Woman who according to
>>> Chibnall was his immediate predecessor. 
>> 
>> You’re letting your imagination get the better of you again.
>> 
>> Chibnall doesn’t say the Fugitive Doctor was Hartnell’s immediate
>> predecessor. In fact, Chibnall says the exact opposite.
>> 
>> Watch ‘The Timeless Children’ again, and pay attention during
>> the Matrix sequence. Those mysterious faces all appear as
>> the immediate pre-Hartnell incarnations.
>> 
>>> All established facts and continuity as well as the story itself 
>>> demonstrates that the faces before Hartnell were those of Morbius when 
>>> he overpowered the Doctor's mind and started winning the game, therefore 
>>> his faces were displayed on screen like anyone with any intelligence, 
>>> even a 6 year old would naturally assume.
>>> 
>> 
>> I like to hope that I have more intelligence than a
>> six-year-old. But I’ll leave that to the group to decide.
>> 
> 
> You dirty lying Bird SP!
> 

No lie. I really do hope that I have more intelligence than a
six-year-old.

OTOH you should hope that one day you will have more
intelligence than one!

-- 
solar penguin