Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,comp.theory
Subject: Re: D simulated by H never halts no matter what H does V3
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 08:13:48 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v0li2c$12aq4$3@dont-email.me>
References: <uvq0sg$21m7a$1@dont-email.me> <uvsj4v$1h01e$1@i2pn2.org>
 <uvubo2$34nh3$1@dont-email.me> <uvvsap$3i5q8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v00mf6$3nu0r$1@dont-email.me> <v02gu5$6quf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v038om$bitp$2@dont-email.me> <v05b0k$sivu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v05r5e$vvml$2@dont-email.me> <v05vl4$1165d$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0679k$12sq2$1@dont-email.me> <v07r2j$1h57l$1@dont-email.me>
 <v08gn4$1lpta$2@dont-email.me> <v0ag7u$27jkb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0b8np$2d4ja$1@dont-email.me> <v0c317$2538n$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v0c7fn$2k0tc$1@dont-email.me> <v0d3h1$2t938$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0doho$31mkn$2@dont-email.me> <v0forg$3j1dk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0gmrt$3qd6i$1@dont-email.me> <v0hfab$3vjo8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0hgn3$2a19s$7@i2pn2.org> <v0hl90$4ehj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0hna7$2a19s$8@i2pn2.org> <v0hpt4$59oq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0hsd2$2a19s$9@i2pn2.org> <v0i2oh$6orp$2@dont-email.me>
 <v0iog7$2csj2$1@i2pn2.org> <v0j295$dmbi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0jbgf$2djoe$1@i2pn2.org> <v0jdul$g54u$2@dont-email.me>
 <v0l22b$v2br$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:13:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5b5cf6fc6ad4bf43d1327b7299fd7236";
	logging-data="1125188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+xPAD+1ijynIkuSOGXEzW4"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GCdHrrs/8TZo1IjUbDaLEmzUOIs=
In-Reply-To: <v0l22b$v2br$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2975

On 4/28/2024 3:40 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-04-27 17:51:17 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> When you agree that H(D,D) is a correct termination analyzer within
>> my definition then we can proceed to the next point about whether
>> my definition is correct or diverges from the standard definition.
> 
> Nobody will agree that H(D,D) is a correct termination analyzer
> until you post a definition of "termination analyzer" and compare
> H(D,D) to that definition. And nut even then if the comparison is
> insufficient or erronous.
> 

Unless they go through every single slight nuance of the details
of my reasoning they won't be able to see that I am correct.

Unless I insist that they go through every single slight nuance of the
details of my reasoning THEY ALWAYS LEAP TO THE CONCLUSION THAT I AM
WRONG SIMPLY IGNORING WHAT I SAY.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer