Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law
 violations in electrodynamics
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:24:33 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me>
 <e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com>
 <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:24:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0c9a412a0266375bcc309518f631bc1f";
	logging-data="1129334"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZnxIBCpb0VbX/EwN0mDqE"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tYgDpoIPlT+A19Vs4DiTqYbWm1I=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
Bytes: 2363

On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force does
>> NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely theoretical.
>> My evidence is experimental.
> 
> Correct, merely experimental.
> It stands falsified by a reliable theory.
> 
> FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand
> do conserve energy-momentum.
> If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you
> to tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
> and how these equations must be modified.
> 
> As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,
> 

It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent 
violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the 
electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to 
produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his 
experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness 
that he insists this is something new that violates 
Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do 
get the incompetent tinkerer.