Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law violations in electrodynamics Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:24:33 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <v0limi$12erm$1@dont-email.me> References: <uvb7db$2bj35$1@tor.dont-email.me> <e7b18fbbd25aef1edf75d3fd7baa053a@www.novabbs.com> <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:24:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0c9a412a0266375bcc309518f631bc1f"; logging-data="1129334"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZnxIBCpb0VbX/EwN0mDqE" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:tYgDpoIPlT+A19Vs4DiTqYbWm1I= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <1qso30i.hyqy7pf46wb5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> Bytes: 2363 On 4/27/2024 5:50 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force does >> NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely theoretical. >> My evidence is experimental. > > Correct, merely experimental. > It stands falsified by a reliable theory. > > FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand > do conserve energy-momentum. > If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you > to tell the world what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz, > and how these equations must be modified. > > As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer, > It is entirely possible that Banjo stumbled across that apparent violation of momentum by momentum being carried away by the electromagnetic field. But we will never know since he refuses to produce a writeup in sufficient detail for someone to reproduce his experiment, instead writing "Watch my videos!!!". Add his stubbornness that he insists this is something new that violates Newton/Einstein/Maxwell rather than a known existing behavior, you do get the incompetent tinkerer.