Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: charging port
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:37:19 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v0mtkg$1c1gb$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v0jaut$31m8$1@solani.org>
 <k9tr2j19vuhaego7es9gmspjvfha7q6ulr@4ax.com> <v0lad6$4694$1@solani.org>
 <v0lidt$448g$1@solani.org> <v0lkbh$12lmq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0lnim$448g$3@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 03:37:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="586493b397abb210b2e87e447a9c85ec";
	logging-data="1443339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/SboHTnGsDWqhz3xTekg0lvUw4AIJJdO4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cXy8jbwTkpGA9J9bw+B26zPW0aM=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <v0lnim$448g$3@solani.org>
Bytes: 2182

On 2024-04-28 07:47, Wilf wrote:
> On 28/04/2024 at 14:52, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
>> On 28.04.24 15:19, Wilf wrote:
>>> On 28/04/2024 at 12:03, badgolferman wrote:
>>>> The battery is down to 88% already, but the tech told me Apple
>>>> doesn’t recommend changing the battery until it gets below 80%.
>>>
>>> The battery in my iPhone 14 Pro,  purchased October 2022, is now down to
>>> maximum capacity 86%, which severely limits the length of any charge.  I
>>> must say that I'm surprised at this after only 18 months.  Oh well.  And
>>> I'm not a troll, my name isn't the mythical "Arlen", and my battery
>>> really is down to 86%.
>>
>> What is your question?
>> You simply mistreated the battery of your phone. Quite simple. My iPhone
>> 14 is running 24/7 since I bought it in November 22. The battery
>> performance level is still 100% according to the device.
>>
>>
> 
> Whatever. You're treatment of your iPhone must be legendary.  But 
> honestly, you just can't be civil, can you?
> 

In what particular was he UNcivil?