Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v0pqsr$28g0v$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Threads across programming languages Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 04:09:00 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <v0pqsr$28g0v$3@dont-email.me> References: <GIL-20240429161553@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <v0oh9f$1rdff$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v0p02j$1ur12$5@dont-email.me> <v0pq95$28cml$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 06:09:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7b9c5c061751fa9a194e47f34ce1cb82"; logging-data="2375711"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vsy0Jldiy6hjq0XRrZpVM" User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f0BagL4LupCXvOAFdlt5I7ztyos= Bytes: 1874 On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 05:58:31 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 29.04.2024 um 22:31 schrieb Lawrence D'Oliveiro: > >> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 18:18:57 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote: >> >>> But you need multithreading to have maximum throughput since you often >>> process the data while other data is available. >> >> In a lot of applications, the bottleneck is the network I/O, or a GUI >> waiting for the next user event, that kind of thing. In this situation, >> multithreading is more trouble than it’s worth. This is why coroutines >> (in the form of async/await) have made a comeback over the last decade >> or so. > > Having a single thread and using state machines is more effortz. It would indeed. That’s why coroutines (async/await) are so handy.