Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: From the Archives .....
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:59:39 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <v0qiuq$2ducu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uvtn5t$30593$1@dont-email.me> <v0b09r$d50$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <v0djg5$30lfn$1@dont-email.me> <v0ehbd$37ds0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0ej7l$29l3$16@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v0g97i$3n622$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0h81i$3u3vn$2@dont-email.me>
 <xn0ol2do5lllsbh006@news.eternal-september.org> <v0kf8m$r9ud$2@dont-email.me>
 <xn0ol3qfb1a60li000@post.eweka.nl> <v0lp6v$141cf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0m4c9$16nip$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:59:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="575250c4854f5bf2ddf7cb5298c0f520";
	logging-data="2554270"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+R1ytcijjc6gd4K+5OvvVpVPBt6FOEjMQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gov/dIvp/WcOPPBe1Hj5Ca15inc=
In-Reply-To: <v0m4c9$16nip$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3343

The True Doctor wrote on 29/4/24 4:26 am:
> On 28/04/2024 16:15, The Last Doctor wrote:
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>> On 27/04/2024 08:57, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Where's Doctor Ruth among the faces of the Doctor? She's 
>>>>>> not there because there's no Doctor Ruth. The Doctor's 
>>>>>> regenerations begin at Hartnell. Where's Ruth's before his 
>>>>>> face? It's not there because all the faces after Hartnell 
>>>>>> are those of Morbius, and Hartnell is declared as the 
>>>>>> beginning of the Doctor, not Ruth.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ah c'mon Aggy at least try and be serious. How can the face 
>>>>> of a woman from a 2020 episode of Doctor Who be featured in 
>>>>> an episode of Doctor Who from 1976 when the idea hadn't even 
>>>>> been thought of?
>>>> 
>>>> How can an abused child from another dimension that was turned 
>>>> into a monster possibly be the predecessor of Hartnell when the
>>>> idea wasn't thought of until 2018?
>>> 
>>> Fiction my boy, it's fiction about a time travelling alien... so 
>>> outside of the real world a writer can write any scenario he 
>>> wants to in retrospect if he thinks it's good for telling the 
>>> story he wants to tell. You don't have to like it, believe it, or
>>> think it makes sense. Chris Chibnall doesn't care if his ideas
>>> don't fit your idea of Doctor Who, or mine even. But it's what he
>>> chose to do.
>> 
>> Insisting that an idea that wasn’t thought of fifty years earlier
>> can’t change the course of the show is a bit bonkers anyway.
> 
> Any new idea added to any existing literature cannot change previous
>  established facts,

Yeah, like the FACT that, way back when, The Doctor could re-generate
only FIVE times. Such a minor point .... easily changed to TWELVE times!!

And then, lets give them/The Master a whole new set of Twelve!!
-- 
Daniel