Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v0qugu$259ok$1@paganini.bofh.team>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?P=E1sztor_Borb=E9ly_M=E9sz=E1ros?= <ojt@rtr.hu>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.research,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.research,sci.physics
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 07:27:39 PDT
Organization: To protect and to server
Lines: 20
Approved: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]" <dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com (sci.physics.research)
Message-ID: <v0qugu$259ok$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <uuo0lt$16aoj$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net vBrhimgh9+ZNzf3g/Ed2/QGtNFKKrhIpPrx/38G2BGs3AuHAgPL7h9ml/e
Cancel-Lock: sha1:a/9OVIC8S7bd6t3BnfQHQIMbGyQ= sha256:9AUc8BiLC2sw7koLksitEE9OSFj9Cci1zKTSxNISw0M=
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUIN2iv6RvZDpB1Ru3I7rDwBB8PjLPg8RRki3vdq1QjMNuOqOQCkrvx8hcUKlym68l5kWu8Re094N7/CVrLfNwjsX8WDu+XIs4X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEGQsYuwXgpBWdySayZZ4v+ZfV6WcosAM+ooBHuARdW+3D6AlFF7AoU6HKz62Sj5Wm0FCjz
X-Face: $"eO7q^g,@mN0klG2J]sV"NMbeVMf2'-;P*@(~`UkK_cA{lP/ixtb>t!n{xTQK<7
Bytes: 2127

Volney wrote:

> My question is, assume there is a massless (or very tiny mass, not
> massive like W/Z) boson with spin-0 which mediates a new force. Its
> field 'tensor'
> would be zero-dimensional or just a scalar. What would this mean on a
> macroscopic scale? I guess each point in space would have a simple value
> in response to a nearby charge, not a vector like EM.
> 
> How about a spin-3 (or more!) boson? Spin-3 would imply a 3D tensor
> defining its field's properties. Again what macroscopic properties would
> a field mediated by a spin-3 boson have? I know this is vague since the
> only property is the spin of the mediating boson but this must imply
> certain properties come from this, but what?

this is incorrect. To undrestand that you have to undrestand tensors big
time. Not just overbebly.

[[Mod. note -- Marketing spam snipped.
DON'T INCLUDE SPAM IN YOUR POSTS!  -- jt]]