Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v0r2ji$2hb7o$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Proving my 2004 claim that some decider/input pairs are incorrect questions Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:26:42 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 66 Message-ID: <v0r2ji$2hb7o$2@dont-email.me> References: <usppqv$b9av$2@dont-email.me> <v0p4qi$204cj$1@dont-email.me> <v0p5j8$206i3$1@dont-email.me> <v0qhl8$157k$1@news.muc.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:26:42 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e18070faf38e3938218949b4b017f26c"; logging-data="2665720"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/TxvxvSDxhTDKXcVCRwCnV" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mg71zBGClAqbZeQagZap1G4nufw= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v0qhl8$157k$1@news.muc.de> Bytes: 3576 On 4/30/2024 5:37 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > [ Followup-To: set ] > > In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4/29/2024 4:52 PM, Barb Knox wrote: >>> On 13/03/2024 03:45, olcott wrote: >>>> This is my 2004 work that proposes that the halting problem has >>>> an unsatisfiable specification thus asks an ill-formed question. > >>> [SNIP] > >>>> "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius >>>> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer > >>> "Persistent willful ignorance hits a target that doesn't exist." B Knox > >>> "But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all >>> who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed >>> at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed >>> at Bozo the Clown." Carl Sagan > > >> Baseless rhetoric noted. > > Not at all baseless from anybody who's read (some of) your thousands of > posts to this newsgroup. > >> E C R Hehner. *Objective and Subjective Specifications* >> WST Workshop on Termination, Oxford. 2018 July 18. >> See https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/OSS.pdf > >> Bill Stoddart. *The Halting Paradox* >> 20 December 2017 >> https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05340 >> arXiv:1906.05340 [cs.LO] > >> I see you carefully analyzed the work of these two PhD computer science >> professors and concluded it was nonsense on the basis of your assumption >> that it must be nonsense. > > That's a non-sequitur. What is nonsense is most of what YOU have posted > here, and this has been pointed out to you time after time after time. *This was the head of the original post* This is my 2004 work that proposes that the halting problem has an unsatisfiable specification thus asks an ill-formed question. *Two PhD computer science professors agree with this analysis* E C R Hehner. *Objective and Subjective Specifications* WST Workshop on Termination, Oxford. 2018 July 18. See https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hehner/OSS.pdf Bill Stoddart. *The Halting Paradox* 20 December 2017 https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.05340 arXiv:1906.05340 [cs.LO] *So you too assume that their work must be nonsense on* *the basis of your assumption that it must be nonsense* -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer