Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v0t6vp$34adu$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Linux doesn't seem to manage memory very well Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 11:53:45 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 23 Message-ID: <v0t6vp$34adu$1@dont-email.me> References: <v0t5nk$3415a$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 12:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c6276d30a79ed43df2130147c04f69e2"; logging-data="3287486"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/k6Dce98F4sonQiPSiRNgsDDL4tHiLsKU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PQLTI2Tep5iFE7CrsiPU3EEPBMQ= In-Reply-To: <v0t5nk$3415a$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 1950 On 01/05/2024 11:32, James Harris wrote: > Not a question, just an observation. > > I say that Linux doesn't seem to handle memory well because my laptop > had 8GB RAM (which, frankly, Windows seems to find perfectly adequate > for a similar workload). Under Linux the RAM would fill up and then swap > space would be used. Then the machine would become largely unresponsive > - e.g. taking minutes to switch between windows. > > So I upgraded the RAM. It now has three times as much (i.e. 24GB)! But > even so, RAM has still steadily filled up until reaching the full 24GB. > What's more, it's now showing 4.8GB of swap space in use. > > That's not Linux. That's a rogue program with a memory leak... -- “It is hard to imagine a more stupid decision or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Thomas Sowell