Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.omega.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux doesn't seem to manage memory very well
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 14:08:34 -0500
Organization: TNet Consulting
Message-ID: <v0u3vi$lda$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References: <v0t5nk$3415a$1@dont-email.me>
 <v0tl23$j31$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
 <v0trh9$39235$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 19:08:34 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="omega.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.1.140";
	logging-data="21930"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v0trh9$39235$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1411
Lines: 14

On 5/1/24 11:44, candycanearter07 wrote:
> I prefer htop.

To each their own.

As long as their own gets the job done.

I've stuck with top as many systems I've worked on didn't have htop 
installed and I never felt compelled to justify why htop needed to be 
installed / top wouldn't suffice to the change approval board.



-- 
Grant. . . .